Message 2: February 18, 2010, 4:58:30PM Yoram has left a new comment on your post “WHO IS JORGE PUELLO, PT 2: JUMPING DOWN THE RABBIT…“: Sorry for the link it wont work that way http://www.jugements.qc.ca/ use this one and tipe my name JORGE TORRES or UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS JORGE TORRES read it below SUPERIOR COURT CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OFMONTREAL No:500-36-003375-048 DATE:June 9th, 2004 ______________________________________________________________________ PRESIDING:THE HONOURABLEMr. JUSTICEJ. FRASER MARTIN, J.S.C.______________________________________________________________________ TORRES, JORGE ANIBAL Petitioner v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent And LE DIRECTEUR DU CENTRE DE DÉTENTION R.D.P. Third party______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT______________________________________________________________________ [1] I am inclined in particular circumstances of this case to take a rather restrictive view of article 69 of the Extradition Act. [2] There is one thing that is clear. This is intended to be an expeditive procedure, the act is drafted in that fashion, delays are set out and the delays stand to be respected. [3] There is no doubt that to some considerable degree Mr. Torres is the author of his own misfortune, in view of the (numerous, huge) number of letters that have been sent on an ongoing argument at various dates to the Ministry of Justice but that does Continue Reading →

Message 3: February 18, 2010 5:00:52PMYoram has left a new comment on your post “WHO IS JORGE PUELLO, PT 2: JUMPING DOWN THE RABBIT…“: If you want a letter of my sinagogue in canada I will send it to everyone, I BELONG TO THE OLDEST SYNAGOGUE IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES, even before all this Sphardic hater Kuzzars came to america. We are the true jews the Jews from the Arab Countries and Sepharad. The Ramban, Rambam, Rashi, Onkelos, Don Senior etc. Are all Sephardic. You don´t see any Auskenazim. or Black Hats or Schreimers in during the golden age of Judaism. It makes me sick that all this Kuzzars whant to step over our sages decision. > [ויקרא-Vayikra. 26:44]

Message 4, February 18, 2010, 5:01:54PM Yoram has left a new comment on your post “WHO IS JORGE PUELLO, PT 2: JUMPING DOWN THE RABBIT…“: > [יִרְמְיָה, Yirmĭyahu. 31:37] > [סנהדרין‎-Sanhedrin 44a] – Hide quoted text – > [R. She’ adyá ben Maimon ibn Danan, Khemdah Genuzah, 15a] In views of Divine, Prophetic, Talmudic and post-Talmudic understanding, an apostate Israelite is still an Israelite. It follows that an Anous, who was forced into avoda zara / foreign cult, and their children who are born in a state of duress among non-Jews, are also Israelites: > [R. Abraham de Aboab – year 1694 — Deber Shemuel, No. 45(S. 18c f.)] It hardly ever occurred to the Sages of Israel in the Ottoman Empire, Italy, Algiers, Morocco, Amsterdam, London – in fact every where the most brilliant luminaries of our tradition flourished – to call Anusim “gentiles” much less “proselytes”. Because, as received in the mouth of Rabbi Samuel de Medina from his teacher R. Taytazak, as confirmed by Gaon Zemah, in relation to the Anusim:

Message 5 February 28, 2010, 2010 5:03:42PM Yoram has left a new comment on your post “WHO IS JORGE PUELLO, PT 2: JUMPING DOWN THE RABBIT…“ > [Responsa III, 112] In other words, the proof for the matrilineal descent lies with the accuser . . . Not with the alleged victim. Why? In the Mishna – the compilation of Oral Torah – we find an injunction that says: > [Kiddushin 4:10] In another responsum, now in regards to the Anusim of Ashkenaz (Germany) in the 12th c., Rabbi Salomon bar Simson said: > [Geshichte der Juden in Deutschland a.a. O. p. 29, Bernfeld a.a. O.S. 192.] Why? Very simple, to speak wrongs on Israel leads to impiety, as exposed by Maimonides, of blessed memory: > [Iggeret ha-Shemad, Halkin’s translation, (Philadelphia, 1993) p. 17] Now I am also held accountable. The very claim of the Anusim carries authority, and establishes the main reference point for rabbinical defense. The Rabbis dialogue underneath the voice of the Anusim. We hardly find any actions to the contrary. And since it is in the majority of opinions to consider Anusim as part of Israel, it follows that it is treated with the utmost respect and Continue Reading →

Message 6: February 18, 2010: 5:04:23PM Yoram has left a new comment on your post “WHO IS JORGE PUELLO, PT 2: JUMPING DOWN THE RABBIT…“ Again, I must go back to the few Rabbis who are aware (not even knowing) the legal precedence on Anusim, and yet have to conform to the Status Quo to avoid any problems. Yet, let it be known they are not obliged and loop wholes can be found within the system. In all fairness, you must understand that the whole issue of “conversion” is abhorred in the minds of some Anusim. They have every right to think so. We know that some people demanded also conversion from Yemenite Jews decades ago, yet the Yemenite community stood on its feet and fought their way through. How does one Jew have the right to invalidate the other’s lineage? Anusim lack the communal aspect, and as a result they cannot defend themselves jointly.By all that we know on Anusim, no ceremony of “conversion” was ever performed and neither a certificate was ever issued. Can anyone bring me the Responsa from 1400’s to 1800’s that explicitly show how this was ever done? For all we know, Anusim were treated Continue Reading →

Message 7: February 18, 2010 5:04:44PM Yoram has left a new comment on your post “WHO IS JORGE PUELLO, PT 2: JUMPING DOWN THE RABBIT…“: > For Judaism to be operative in what we call the “chain of tradition”, the full force the Written and Oral Torah, the commentaries of the Talmud, and the post-Rabbinic tradition as deposited in the Responsa have to operate hand in hand. To render any of these useless, renders the whole “chain” inoperative. For this reason, Maimónides in his Mishne Torah – who in the name of the Sages – says: > [MT Hilkhot Mamurim, II.2] Because it is certain that we all are dwarfs in the presence of the luminaries of the tradition, and when will it happen for us to surpass them? Let me let you into a secret: Never. And how can anyone explain to the Anusim – with the full use of Halakha – how these most central matters on Israel’s identity do not come violated to its very core through the use of Giur? Is this perhaps a joke? Can Israel be Israel without what the Sages have known for all times? And how can one invalidate the lineage of Continue Reading →