Washington: Bastard Nation Testimony in Opposition to HB 2211/suggested amendments

HB2 2211
Adoptee access to their own original birth certificates
Washington House Committee on the Judiciary
January 16, 2011
Privilege is the opposite of rights
Our Washington representative cannot attend the hearing today so we are submitting this testimony via email.
Bastard Nation: the Adoptee Rights Organization is the largest adoptee civil rights organization in the United States. We support full, unrestricted access for all adopted persons, to their original birth certificates. (OBC).
Bastard Nation’s roots are in Washington State, and we would like nothing more than to support HB 2211. Unfortunately we cannot.
The sticking point is HB 2211’s “affidavit of non-disclosure,” otherwise known as a disclosure veto. This veto creates a special third party privilege for birthparents that no one, parent or otherwise, possesses: to bypass state law and to personally bar release of another person’s birth certificate to the person to whom it pertains.
Already in place for adoptions finalized on and after October 1 1993, HB 2022 would expand this onerous and discriminatory veto privilege to cover all adoptions; thus expanding the pool of segregated adoptees unable to access their OBCs, even when the vast majority of the state’s adoptees could..
Interestingly, HB 2211 expires on July 1, 2012, all current vetoes on file. Those birthparents wishing to remain on the veto books would be required to file a new disclosure veto limited to two years duration, and subject to continued filings every two years.
It appears that the sponsors of the bill have it half right. They are willing to permit the state’s adopted class OBC access—unless a third part objects—but limit that third party objection to two year increments. That is, the sponsors appear to find something inherently wrong with vetoes, but feel some sort of obligation to the keep them going .Such an attitude may justify past bad legislation but does not justify denying the adoptees of Washington State the restoration of their civil rights. There is no middle way when it comes to rights: a right exists or it doesn’t, and it is not contingent on third party approval.
Sooner or later Washington and every other state that has not opened OBCs unconditionally to adoptees are going to be forced to. The issue isn’t going away. This is not a matter of if, but when.

Adopted adults, especially since 911, are increasingly denied passports, drivers licenses, pensions, Social Security benefits, professional certifications, and security clearances due to discrepancies on their amended birth certificates, and their inability to produce an original birth certificate to answer the problems. Proposed changes in passport application regulations will make it literally impossible for some adoptees to ever receive a passport without an accessible paper trial to the OBC.

Adoptees without a genuine original birth record could soon be barred from running for public office.‭ ‬Last year, at least‭ ‬10‭ ‬states, introduced legislation requiring presidential and vice-presidential candidates to present their original birth certificates to appropriate authorities to prove citizenship eligibility for office.‭ ‬Some of these bills go farther,‭ ‬mandating anyone running for office to prove citizenship through an original birth certificate.‭ ‬It is no stretch to think that someday soon adoptees could be barred from voting due to lack of‭ “‬legal.‭”birth certificates.

Should these rights and entitlements be abrogated for adoptaees because OBC access might make some people “uncomfortable?”
As I said in the beginning, were it not for the disclosure veto in all it;’s forms,, including modified, we and our members would happy to support HB 2211.
We recommend that Washington State make history, and simply expire permanently all vetoes currently in place. Amend HB 2211 with the following:
  • remove the expansion of the disclosure veto 
  • vacate all disclosure veto language from the current law
  • unilaterally expire all vetoes currently on file on the effective date of HB 2211
Kansas and Alaska have never sealed original birth certificates. Since 1999 six states have restored to adoptees the unrestricted right to records and identity access: Oregon through ballot initiative, and Alabama, New Hampshire, Maine, and Rhode Island through legislation. No statistics are available for Kansas and Alaska, and Rhode Island’s records won’t be opened until July 1, 2012, but approximately 17,000 OBCs in the latter five states have been released with no reported ill consequences.

Rights are for all citizens, not favors doled out to some. Washington does not segregate rights by religion, ethnicity, age, or gender. It should not segregate rights by birth, adoptive status, or third party preference.

Unless you amend HB 2211 to a clean bill to recognize the right of all of the state’s adopted people to their own OBC without restriction, then vote DO NOT PASS . Washington adoptees must enjoy equal protection, due process, and dignity, not favors.
Submitted by Marley Greiner
Executive Chair
Bastard Nation: the adoptee rights organization
January 16, 2011

Bastard Nation is dedicated to the recognition of the full human and civil rights of adult adoptees. Toward that end, we advocate the opening to adoptees, upon request at age of majority, of those government documents which pertain to the adoptee’s historical, genetic, and legal identity, including the unaltered original birth certificate and adoption decree. Bastard Nation asserts that it is the right of people everywhere to have their official original birth records unaltered and free from falsification, and that the adoptive status of any person should not prohibit him or her from choosing to exercise that right. We have reclaimed the badge of bastardy placed on us by those who would attempt to shame us; we see nothing shameful in having been born out of wedlock or in being adopted. Bastard Nation does not support mandated mutual consent registries or intermediary systems in place of unconditional open records, nor any other system that is less than access on demand to the adult adoptee, without condition, and without qualification.

3 Replies to “Washington: Bastard Nation Testimony in Opposition to HB 2211/suggested amendments”

  1. I actually just emailed my state reps in support of H2211. Base on the presumption that most bith mothers want contact. I have heard over and over the statistic that >90% of birthmothers consent to reunion when they are asked. I know many adoptees and have never personally heard a case where the birthmom refuses contact. I’ll copy the letter I sent and the weblinks where you can email your state rep with your opinion.
    Please vote yes on HB 2211

    Thanks so much for considerng this bill! Time is running out for us older adoptees. My daughter’s father in law searched for years for his birth mother, only to find her one year after she passed away. He learned that she had searched for decades in hope of finding him. It is appalling that the state has been interested in keeping families apart. I myself am in search of my birth mother, I’m 50, she is over 70 and I certainly hope that we can reach each other before it is too late. There is a mechanism for birth mothers to opt out if desired, so their rights are protected. I have heard from confidential intermediaries that over 90% of birth mothers wish contact when they are located and asked for consent. We should set up the law to favor the majority. Will the state take action to protect the rights of the majority?
    thanks so much for your help,
    Victoria Carter

    PS, I am a happy adoptee. My parents (adoptive) were wonderful loving people but since they were the age of most grandparents(56 and 42) when I was born, I will very soon be alone in the world. My mom is 90, I love her dearly and am absolutely dreading the day when it will be just me. Something is missing. Something has always been missing. That is why I started a WARM search in the early 90s at a cost that was like a kings ransom when I had small children to support. So far nothing. Apparently my documents have been “lost” I was unfortunately adopted out of Pierce county which is notorious for refusing to give adoptees their personal information. A single change in one word of the law (from shall to will) will help Pierce county adpotees get the basics of who they are. As it stands I have absolutely no information about myself. No medical history, no ethnic identity, no siblings. All things that most citizens take for granted. I did not give my consent for this and truly believe that my civil rights are being violated. Odds are very high that my birth family did not give consent for this secrecy (but if so, I would respect it). It is overwhemingly likely that this state of affairs was imposed by our government in an antiquated atempt to protect us from our “shame”. It is really time to come into the 21st century.

    go here, type your adress in, and get a link to the email of your WA state rep

    Dont throw the baby out with the bathwater! this bill is mostly good and will result in most of us getting our original birth certificate

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *