Resources: Haiti Adoption. What’s the background? Why is it a big deal with Amy Coney Barrett?

With the nomination of Haiti “orphan” adopter Amy Coney Barrett to the US Supreme Court, Haiti and Haitian orphans are back in the news–hot and sweaty with adoption mythology, white saviorism, and lots of political and religious bashing. If you are not adopted, the subject may not be important to you. If you are adopted, it is.

I am working on a new Haiti adoption blog, but in the meantime, I am throwing out a couple of resources for anyone, including media, looking for background on why the question of Haitian adoption and Amy Coney Barrett is important.

(1) Oldtimers may remember that I had a Haiti blog.


The page is an essential archival document.

It contains a couple hundred entries covering news and updates on the post-earthquake Haitian “orphan crisis,” orphanage conditions, family unification, evangelical and Catholic interference in refugee and child care (including the attempt to stop contraceptive distribution to people in camps),  neocoloniallism,  the international adoption cartel, entitled  PAPs, kid-snatching, do-gooding, “orphan” airlifts, corrupt practices,  scams–including, of course, Laura Silsby and her merry band of adopta-pranksters. (A lot about them). 

I was in frequent contact with Silsby’s “lawyer” Jorge Puello while he was on the lam from the FBI and Interpol. About once a year he contacts me to bitch me out for not portraying him in the light he sees himself.  I like to tell him the con got conned.  A couple years down the road I refused to help spring him from an unpleasant Salvadorian jail  (he included pictures in his emails) that was so unpleasant he had internet access–unlike American jails.

The page also contains lots of links to documents, organizations, and their statements.

Some of what I covered wasn’t covered by anyone outside of obscure sites.  Some is pure original investigation. As an oppositional researcher, I dug dirt daily. At the height of the crisis, I got about 3000 hits a day, including frequent visits from The US State Department, the US Senate, and the New York Times.

I’ve lost the password to Stop Exportation and can’t get into it right now to add new material.  Blogger isn’t much help, but I am trying.  In the meantime whatever I post on Haiti will be here and on the Bastard Nation Haiti page.

(2)  Greg Luce, from Adoptee Rights Law Center has an excellent post today, on Haiti, Barrett, and international adoption in general What Happens When You Question Adoption

Thus, the simple issue of raising questions about the Barretts’ two intercountry adoptions became a touchstone, one built on an issue that gets packaged any number of ways, depending generally on your political views, background, and connection to adoption. For conservative Republicans who support the nomination, inquiries into the Barretts’ adoptions are considered “off limits,” outrageous even, an affront to the unquestioning “beauty” and necessity of adoption itself. For opponents of Judge Barrett’s nomination—and for critics of intercountry adoption generally—questions have been raised about the process the Barretts followed, specifically whether the adoptions were legal, transparent, and involved the relinquishment of an actual orphan, especially the 2010 adoption during Haiti’s recovery from a devastating earthquake. The issue for many critics thus became one of structure, questioning intercountry adoption itself and raising issues that have long plagued the packaging and marketing of “adoptable” children, primarily adoptees of color who are born in developing countries and adopted by white parents….

…The politicization of the Barretts’ adoptions from Haiti (which they’ve clearly politicized themselves) highlights the rift between concept and reality in intercountry adoption. The Barretts and many others, particularly evangelical Christians, portray intercountry adoption as a solution to the “problem” of orphaned children, though the term “orphan” has often been misappropriated to mean “available” and may not mean that the child has no family members or parents still alive. Behind the “solution” to orphan children is yet another purpose: Christianizing children of color by adding them to white Christian families and ultimately to “God’s flock.”

Read it!

4 Replies to “Resources: Haiti Adoption. What’s the background? Why is it a big deal with Amy Coney Barrett?”

  1. On of the adoptions occurred during the relevant time period.

    “Vivian is our miracle,” she told the Senate Judiciary Committee in a 2017 hearing, explaining that the girl, then 13, was so ill when she was adopted at 14 months that doctors doubted she would ever walk or speak. “Today Vivian is a track star, and I assure you she has no trouble talking,” Barrett said.

    She said that John Peter, then 10, “joined our family in 2010 when he was 3 years old after the devastating earthquake in Haiti.”

    • Thanks. I have not commented on the details of the adoptions yet. We need to be careful in getting facts, not opinions. But do have more to say. Working on it in the next couple days. Twitter went nuts. that said, Barrett is dangerous, and I don’t want these adoptions to be a sideshow.

    • Thanks so much. This is an excellent piece. And yes, voices need to be heard–loud.

      I am adding this to the BN Haiti page tonight.

      For some time now we’ve linked Intercountry Adoptee Voices on our International page. It’s taking forever to “finish” it since there is no finish. I have 3 countries to go before the first big round is through. Then there will be additional countries to add 1 at a time. Every country has its own horror story and agenda. Every time I work on a page, I get angry and depressed–and even astounded– all over again. Secret adoption, anonymity, trafficking, government complicity (if not “licensure.”) expropriation, civil war, intercountry war, crappy orphanages, and $$$$$$$$. And of course, the lengths public and private officials will go to keep the secrets shut us up. Adoption is a huge civil rights violation that nobody gives a shit about because it’s “about the children.” (which is why they should care). I swear the only countries I’ll up with that have no scandal be Andorra or San Marino, but then I’m sure there’s something there, too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *